Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

CBCA further limits the Federal Circuit’s decision in Maropakis

By K. Tyler Thomas
January 12, 2016
  • Claims and Terminations
  • Government Contracts
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

On January 5, 2016, the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) issued a decision that is another in a line of decisions that erodes the Federal Circuit’s holding in M. Maropakis Carpentry, Inc. v. United States, 609 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2010). In Maropakis, the Federal Circuit held that certain contractor defenses to government claims are actually contractor claims under the Contract Disputes Act’s (CDA), meaning they must first be submitted to the contracting officer for decision and cannot be raised for the first time in litigation. Since that decision, both the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) and the boards of contract appeals have narrowed the scope of the Federal Circuit’s decision in Maropakis. See, e.g., Total Eng’g, Inc. v. United States, 120 Fed. Cl. 10 (2015) (The CDA does not require the contractor to jump through such an extra hoop and refile its defense to a government claim as a so-called contractor’s ‘claim’ where it is not seeking any separate monetary relief or contract adjustment.). For more information on the Total Engineering case, see our previous post here.

Most recently, in Jane Mobley Assoc., Inc., v. Gen. Serv. Admin., CBCA 2878, 2016 WL 73878, the CBCA explained the difference between an affirmative CDA claim and a defense to a government claim:

An affirmative CDA claim is an attempt to modify or adjust the contract to counter the liquidated damages assessment (e.g., compensable time extensions as a result of government delays). A factual defense to a liquidated damages assessment merely serves to attack the assessment itself (e.g., the government’s assessment was incorrect because the delay was excused as a result of government delays). Plainly stated, a CDA claim seeks affirmative relief under the contract through a contract adjustment; a factual defense only attempts to reduce or eliminate the liquidated damages assessment.
Id. (emphasis original) (citations omitted).

In distinguishing (and limiting) Maropakis, the CBCA stated:

In the CDA context, if we were to apply the rule of Maropakis to any defense raised by a contractor in response to a government claim that is not in the nature of an adjustment of contract terms or not seeking separate monetary relief, the “drastic consequence” could well be that the contractor’s appeal is never able to be heard on the merits. This is contrary to the intent and purpose of the CDA.
Id. (emphasis original).

This holding, and the steady departure from Maropakis, is beneficial for contractors because it promotes efficient adjudication in defending against government claims. Nevertheless, contractors should remain cognizant of the Federal Circuit’s holding in Maropakis and assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether their defense qualifies as a “claim” under the CDA.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
K. Tyler Thomas

About K. Tyler Thomas

Tyler Thomas is a member of the government contracts practice in the Denver office where his practice focuses on all aspects of government contracts counseling and litigation with an emphasis on contract claims and disputes related to cost and pricing and allowability issues. A significant portion of Tyler's practice also focuses on internal and government investigations, bid protests, contract formation issues, requests for equitable adjustments, and providing clients statutory and regulatory guidance.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Government Contracts
  • Small Business/Socioeconomic Issues/Preference Requirements

Early Holiday Gift to Small Business Subcontractors: Final Rule Issued Regarding Accelerated Payments

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
  • Government Contracts

HASC Signals DOD Acquisition Reform Effort

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
  • Government Contracts
  • Procurement Fraud Investigations and Defense

President Obama’s 2015 Budget Increases Funding for Fraud and Compliance Enforcement

By Dentons Government Contracts Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2022 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site