Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

COFC Decision Rejects Government’s Argument That The Contractor Was Required To File A Claim To Assert An Affirmative Defense

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
January 30, 2015
  • Claims and Terminations
  • Government Contracts
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

When the Federal Circuit issued its 2010 Maropakis decision, many in the government contracts bar immediately grew concerned about the potential application and scope of that decision.  However, subsequent Court of Federal Claims (COFC) and Boards of Contract Appeals (BCAs) decisions have generally (and appropriately) placed certain boundaries on Maropakis, and provided some clarification about its scope.  The COFC’s decision in Total Engineering is no different, but presents an additional twist.

Pertinently, in Total Engineering, the contractor appealed the government’s affirmative claim seeking payment of approximately $2.3 million due to the contractor’s allegedly defective work, and asserted a “defective specifications” defense. The government filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that, under Maropakis, the contractor was required to submit an affirmative CDA claim before it could assert its defense. (The government argued that the contractor was really asserting an impracticability claim.) The Court rejected the government’s argument, and distinguished the facts in this case from the situation in Maropakis. Here, the Court found that the contractor was not seeking any separate monetary relief or adjustment to the contract’s terms based on its “defective specifications” defense.  Rather, the contractor only was arguing that the government’s design was the root of the alleged defective work, not the contractor’s workmanship – i.e., the contractor merely followed the government’s specifications which resulted in the defective work.  Further, the Court noted that “a favorable resolution of [the contractor’s] defense would not result in any separate contract adjustment or monetary relief to [the contractor],” and a result, the Court found that the contractor’s defense was not a claim as defined in FAR 2.101. (It is also worth noting that the contracting officer’s final decision considered and rejected the same “defective specifications” defense.)

Ultimately, this decision is a pragmatic one, and as the Court states, “[t]he CDA does not require the contractor to jump through such an extra hoop and refile its defense to a Government claim as a so-called contractor’s ‘claim’ where it is not seeking any separate monetary relief or contract adjustment.”  However, because the application of Maropakis generally is based on the specific facts and “defenses” presented, contractors still must consider whether or not to submit a CDA claim to the contracting officer (or how to frame a CDA claim) in order to preserve/assert certain defenses at the trial level. Total Engineering presents a somewhat unique fact pattern that will not apply in every instance.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Government Contracts Group

About Dentons Government Contracts Group

Operating at the intersection of law, business and government, the Dentons’ Government Contracts practice delivers creative, flexible and effective business and litigation solutions and strategies, relying not only on our breadth and depth of experience, but also on our proven history of succeeding in the most complex and difficult circumstances.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Events & Happenings
  • Government Contracts
  • Procurement Fraud Investigations and Defense

Join Dr. Patricia Harned, President of the ERC and Dentons for a Discussion on Corporate Ethics

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
  • Costs, Pricing, Business Systems and Appropriations Law
  • Government Contracts

DOD Implementation of CARES Act Section 3610

By Steven Masiello, Joe Martinez, and Phillip Seckman
  • Data and Software Rights, Patent Rights and Cybersecurity
  • Events & Happenings
  • Government Contracts

Webinar: The 2016 Presidential and Congressional Elections: Impacts on DoD’s Technology Innovation Initiative

By Dentons Government Contracts Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site