Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

BIS Issues Guidance on Due Diligence to Prevent Unauthorized Transshipment to Russia

By Jason Silverman
May 19, 2015
  • Government Contracts
  • International Government Contracting and Disputes
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Since the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) – as well as the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) – began imposing restrictions on Russia in response to the situation in Crimea, U.S. exporters have wrestled with what those restrictions mean for their businesses and how to comply with them.  In March 2014, BIS announced that it was placing an indefinite hold on the processing of license applications to Russia.  Following this, BIS imposed additional restrictions on exports to certain industry sectors in Russia, as well as additional end use and end user restrictions.  For instance, BIS imposed restrictions on the export of certain items destined for Russian deep water, Arctic offshore, or shale energy exploration or production in August 2014.  In September 2014, BIS imposed restrictions on exporting specified items if they will be used by a military end user or for a military end use. Then in December 2014, BIS added certain microprocessors to the military end user and end use restrictions.

The restrictions on exports to Russia do not only affect U.S. businesses that have dealings with Russia.  They also increase the risk that other parties to an export transaction may seek to illegally divert goods to Russia.

BIS recently published guidance on its website to help exporters conduct due diligence to prevent such unauthorized diversions or transshipments to Russia.  Exporters with sophisticated compliance programs will likely notice that the guidance itself is familiar: it largely references existing BIS guidance on red flags and knowing one’s customer (see also EAR Part 732, Supp. 3).  For instance, BIS reiterates its admonition concerning the “red flag” that an exported item will not be used for its intended purpose or by its intended recipient.  It advises researching all parties to a transaction with a watchful eye for indications of planned diversion.  This includes researching freight forwarders and distributors to understand which countries and industries they service.  The new guidance also points readers to the consolidated export screening list as well as the list-based and end-user and end-use based controls that may apply to Russia.

The familiar substance of this “new” guidance does not so much suggest that BIS believed additional guidance was necessary.  Rather, it suggests that BIS believes exporters could be doing more to prevent unlawful diversion of items – explicitly including those items controlled for national security (NS) reasons – to Russia.  While it provides information that should aid exporters in compliance, it also suggests an increased likelihood of enforcement action against companies who neglect to conduct appropriate due diligence and whose exports wind up in Russia. Finally, it serves as a reminder that even (and, perhaps, particularly) exporters who believe they do not conduct business in Russia should carefully examine their end user and end use due diligence processes to ensure that their shipments arrive at the intended destination.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Jason Silverman

About Jason Silverman

Jason Silverman is a member of Dentons' Federal Regulatory and Compliance practice. He helps clients navigate risks and achieve their objectives while confronting issues, with a particular focus on government investigations, export controls, trade and economic sanctions, white collar criminal defense and litigation under the False Claims Act.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • General
  • Government Contracts

Run Don’t CRWL: FY25 NDAA Would Expand Contractor Responsibility Watch List

By Joe Martinez, Phillip Seckman, and Morgan Murphy
  • General
  • Government Contracts

The CAFC Revives Boeing’s Challenge to FAR’s Implementation of CAS Offset Rules: Impacts for Government Contractors Subject to CAS and Future Implications Under Loper Bright

By Gale Monahan, Natalie Seelig, Steven Masiello, and Seamus Curley
  • Government Contracts

October Legislative and Regulatory Update

By Steven Masiello, Joe Martinez, and Chris Fetzer

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site