Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

BIS Issues Guidance on Due Diligence to Prevent Unauthorized Transshipment to Russia

By Jason Silverman
May 19, 2015
  • Government Contracts
  • International Government Contracting and Disputes
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Since the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) – as well as the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) – began imposing restrictions on Russia in response to the situation in Crimea, U.S. exporters have wrestled with what those restrictions mean for their businesses and how to comply with them.  In March 2014, BIS announced that it was placing an indefinite hold on the processing of license applications to Russia.  Following this, BIS imposed additional restrictions on exports to certain industry sectors in Russia, as well as additional end use and end user restrictions.  For instance, BIS imposed restrictions on the export of certain items destined for Russian deep water, Arctic offshore, or shale energy exploration or production in August 2014.  In September 2014, BIS imposed restrictions on exporting specified items if they will be used by a military end user or for a military end use. Then in December 2014, BIS added certain microprocessors to the military end user and end use restrictions.

The restrictions on exports to Russia do not only affect U.S. businesses that have dealings with Russia.  They also increase the risk that other parties to an export transaction may seek to illegally divert goods to Russia.

BIS recently published guidance on its website to help exporters conduct due diligence to prevent such unauthorized diversions or transshipments to Russia.  Exporters with sophisticated compliance programs will likely notice that the guidance itself is familiar: it largely references existing BIS guidance on red flags and knowing one’s customer (see also EAR Part 732, Supp. 3).  For instance, BIS reiterates its admonition concerning the “red flag” that an exported item will not be used for its intended purpose or by its intended recipient.  It advises researching all parties to a transaction with a watchful eye for indications of planned diversion.  This includes researching freight forwarders and distributors to understand which countries and industries they service.  The new guidance also points readers to the consolidated export screening list as well as the list-based and end-user and end-use based controls that may apply to Russia.

The familiar substance of this “new” guidance does not so much suggest that BIS believed additional guidance was necessary.  Rather, it suggests that BIS believes exporters could be doing more to prevent unlawful diversion of items – explicitly including those items controlled for national security (NS) reasons – to Russia.  While it provides information that should aid exporters in compliance, it also suggests an increased likelihood of enforcement action against companies who neglect to conduct appropriate due diligence and whose exports wind up in Russia. Finally, it serves as a reminder that even (and, perhaps, particularly) exporters who believe they do not conduct business in Russia should carefully examine their end user and end use due diligence processes to ensure that their shipments arrive at the intended destination.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Jason Silverman

About Jason Silverman

Jason Silverman is a member of Dentons' Federal Regulatory and Compliance practice. He helps clients navigate risks and achieve their objectives while confronting issues, with a particular focus on government investigations, export controls, trade and economic sanctions, white collar criminal defense and litigation under the False Claims Act.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Commercial Products and Services
  • Government Contracts
  • Procurement Fraud Investigations and Defense

Dentons lawyers to Participate in Webinar About Opportunities in Government Contracting for IT and Commercial Companies, and How Companies Can Stay Out of Trouble

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
  • Government Contracts

Government Contracts Legislative and Regulatory Update – March

By Steven Masiello, Joe Martinez, and Chris Fetzer
  • Claims and Terminations
  • Government Contracts
  • Procurement Fraud Investigations and Defense

It Wouldn’t Be the Holidays Without Another COFC Fraud Counterclaim Decision

By Dentons Government Contracts Group

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site