Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

Concession Contractors Take Note: COFC Finds That CDA Disputes Clause Cannot Be Incorporated Into Concession Contract

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
December 17, 2013
  • Claims and Terminations
  • Government Contracts
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Concession contracts with the Government are different than procurement contracts.  Generally a concession contract does not involve the procurement of property or services by the Government.  In addition, prior COFC decisions have noted that the CDA does not even apply to concession contracts.  So what happens when a concession contract incorporates the CDA contracts disputes FAR clause?  This was this issue faced in Coffee Connections, Inc. v. United States, No. 11-048C.

In this case, a concession contractor appealed the Government’s termination of its concession contract by filing a complaint before the COFC.  (It was not clear from the decision whether or not this was a NAFI contract.)  Although the contract included a disputes clause incorporating the text of FAR 52.233-1 and utilizing the CDA claim framework, the contractor failed to submit a claim with a sum certain to the contracting officer prior to filing its complaint.  The Government moved to dismiss the complaint on that basis, but the COFC denied the motion.  Consistent with prior COFC decisions, Judge Sweeney reminded the parties that the “CDA does not apply to concession contracts.  This is true even if the contract states that the CDA applies because ‘only Congress can waive sovereign immunity; parties may not by contract bestow jurisdiction on a court.’”  Judge Sweeney also rejected the Government’s argument that, even if the CDA doesn’t apply, the contractor must still abide by the terms of the written contract requiring that a claim containing a sum certain be presented to the contracting officer before an appeal can be lodged at the COFC.  Judge Sweeney determined that incorporating the CDA disputes provision essentially was “flawed and unworkable.”  For example, there would be “no time periods that dictate when the contracting officer must furnish a written decision. Thus, in the absence of controlling law, the contract mandates that the plaintiff must submit a claim to the contracting officer, but the contract does not mandate that the contracting officer issue any timely decision on that claim.”  She concluded by pointing out to Government counsel that “[i]t is the government’s responsibility, when preparing contract documents for its concessionaires to sign, to present a contract document that is in accordance with law.”  The COFC ultimately exercised jurisdiction over the dispute as a “standard breach of contract suit under the Tucker Act [28 USC §1491(a)(1)].”

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Government Contracts Group

About Dentons Government Contracts Group

Operating at the intersection of law, business and government, the Dentons’ Government Contracts practice delivers creative, flexible and effective business and litigation solutions and strategies, relying not only on our breadth and depth of experience, but also on our proven history of succeeding in the most complex and difficult circumstances.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Government Contracts
  • International Government Contracting and Disputes

Cuba’s Doors Begin To Open To U.S. Government Contractors

By Allen Green
  • Government Contracts

September Legislative and Regulatory Update

By Steven Masiello, Joe Martinez, Chris Fetzer, and DeAnna R. Hamilton
  • Government Contracts

For commercial item contractors, some improvements—mixed with new and old barriers—in DoD’s final rule on procurement of commercial items and accompanying guidebook

By Phillip Seckman and Steven Masiello

About Dentons

Dentons is designed to be different. As the world’s largest law firm with 20,000 professionals in over 200 locations in more than 80 countries, we can help you grow, protect, operate and finance your business. Our polycentric and purpose-driven approach, together with our commitment to inclusion, diversity, equity and ESG, ensures we challenge the status quo to stay focused on what matters most to you. www.dentons.com

Dentons boilerplate image

Twitter

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2023 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site