Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

It Wouldn’t Be the Holidays Without Another COFC Fraud Counterclaim Decision

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
December 20, 2013
  • Claims and Terminations
  • Government Contracts
  • Procurement Fraud Investigations and Defense
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Given the number of important government contracts decisions issued this year about fraud counterclaims, it is only fitting that the COFC issue another fraud counterclaim decision in the midst of the holiday cheer.  As a follow-up to her Gulf Group General Enterprises decision, Judge Horn once again tackles the Department of Justice (“DoJ”) fraud-related counterclaims and affirmative defenses under the False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. § 3729), pre-FERA, and the Special Plea in Fraud statute (28 U.S.C. § 2514) in Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United States, No. 09-981c.  Weighing-in at 78 pages, this decision highlights how the tables turn in a litigation once the DoJ asserts such counterclaims and affirmative defenses – almost the entire focus of the decision shifts to these counterclaims and defenses which is a deeply factual inquiry.  It also highlights one of the many reasons why it is critical that every government contractor maintain satisfactory compliance practices and procedures – e.g., to curb potential fraudulent acts that may result in the forfeiture of viable claims and a damages/penalty assessment against the contractor.

Specifically, Judge Horn determined that the contractor’s claims were forfeited under the Special Plea in Fraud Statute.  Based on an implied representation theory, the court found clear and convincing evidence that the contractor “intended to deceive HUD into thinking that plaintiff had performed the working entitling plaintiff of payment under the parties’ contract.”  Second, Judge Horn determined that the contractor violated the pre-FERA False Claims Act through “the knowing submission of fraudulent claims and the use of falsified inspection reports in support of fraudulent claims.”  Not only was the contractor now liable to the Government for $44,000, but it also was required to pay the Government’s litigation costs.

During a time of utmost scrutiny in government contracts and as this case demonstrates, government contractors must have adequate compliance practices and procedures in place to stop any behavior that could provide the basis for a fraud counterclaim or affirmative defense.  Otherwise, you run the unnecessary risk of having your holiday cheers turn into holiday jeers.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Dentons Government Contracts Group

About Dentons Government Contracts Group

Operating at the intersection of law, business and government, the Dentons’ Government Contracts practice delivers creative, flexible and effective business and litigation solutions and strategies, relying not only on our breadth and depth of experience, but also on our proven history of succeeding in the most complex and difficult circumstances.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • Government Contracts

DOD Seeks Comments on Insourcing Notification Interim Rule

By Dentons Government Contracts Group
  • Government Contracts

Supply Chain Impact of President Trump’s Executive Order Under the Defense Production Act

By Steven Masiello, Joe Martinez, Gale Monahan, and Phillip Seckman
  • Export Controls
  • Government Contracts

Export Control Reform: It’s On

By Jason Silverman

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site