Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

Government Contracts Advisor

Industry insight & analysis

open menu close menu

Government Contracts Advisor

  • Home
  • About us

Comment Period Extended for the Potentially Impactful Proposed Rule for the Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate-Related Financial Risk

By Phillip Seckman and Lauren Colantonio
February 11, 2023
  • General
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

The proposed rule, “Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate-Related Financial Risk,” would impact contractor costs and create responsibility and fraud risks. Because of policy and practical concerns with the proposed rule, the comment period has been extended until February 13, 2023.

On November 14, 2022, the Department of Defense (“DoD”) proposed a rule requiring certain federal suppliers to disclose greenhouse gas emissions (“GHG”) and climate-related financial risks, as well as set science-based targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 87 Fed. Reg. 68312. Under this proposed rule, “significant contractors,” or those with US$7.5M—$50M in federal contract obligations and “major contractors,” those with greater than US$50M in federal contract obligations, would need to invest substantial resources into emissions accounting regimes to comply. The Government is particularly interested in assessing GHG emissions and climate-related risks like disruptive weather events and material cost fluctuations throughout the federal supply chain and the larger US economy, shifting this burden to major contractors in the hopes they will invest in GHG management. The rule would give contractors one year to develop accounting methods before requiring official disclosures. Two years after publication, major contractors will be mandated to complete a GHG inventory including certain emissions, as well as conduct a climate risk assessment and obtain validation of science-based targets. The comment period of the proposed rule change is now open until February 13, 2023.

The proposed rule is part of the Biden Administration’s agenda to combat climate change set out in Executive Order 14057. The rule aims to mitigate these risks while enhancing US competitiveness and economic growth, promoting environmental justice and creating well-paying job opportunities for American workers as well as using public procurement to be a catalyst for adopting new norms and global standards.

The proposed framework would divide greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions into 3 scopes:

Scope 1: GHG emissions from sources owned or controlled by the contractor

Scope 2: GHG emissions associated with the generation of electricity, heating and cooling, or steam, if purchased for the contractor’s own consumption but occurring at sources owned or controlled by another entity

Scope 3: GHG emissions that are a consequence of the contractor’s operations but occur at sources owned or controlled by another entity

Major contractors will be required to disclose all three types of emissions disclosures while significant contractors and small business concerns, with more than US$50M in contract obligations, will be required to disclose only Scope 1 and 2 emissions. The completeness and accuracy of those disclosures would impact the responsibility of the disclosing contractor and create False Claims Act and False Statements Act risks.

Aside from the magnitude and complexity of determining emissions and the increased costs to contractors, the rule may exceed the statutory limits of the agencies promulgating the rule. While the Department of Defense, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the General Services Administration are granted rulemaking power, it seems unlikely Congress authorized these agencies, each tasked with providing for our military, exploring space and supporting Government operations, respectively, to engage in substantive environmentally-based rulemaking. The comment period for the rule is open until February 13, 2023, after which the agencies will review public comments and determine if, and how, to proceed with a final rule.

See this article on dentons.com

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Phillip Seckman

About Phillip Seckman

Phillip Seckman represents clients concerning government and commercial contract matters. His practice spans a broad range of subjects related to federal procurement law, state and local procurement law, and complex federal regulatory issues. He concentrates his practice in the areas of commercial item acquisitions, GSA schedule contracting, cybersecurity, compliance, internal investigations, and bid protests (both federal and state). A significant component of his practice involves government contract cost allowability, proper cost accounting, and contract cost and pricing issues.

All posts Full bio

Lauren Colantonio

About Lauren Colantonio

Lauren Colantonio is a member of the US Government Contracts practice and focuses on all aspects of government contracts counseling and litigation.

Prior to attending law school, Lauren was the Small Business Administrator at a major defense contractor where she oversaw FAR compliance processes and educated small business owners about the federal procurement process. In industry, Lauren also analyzed data and identified trends in the company’s federal subcontracting spend and participated in the company’s Defense Contract Management Agency yearly compliance audit. She then served as an administrative aide to a US Senator on Capitol Hill. As the Grants Coordinator, she assisted constituents seeking federal aid and secured over US$25 million of federal grant funding.

While earning her Juris Doctor, Lauren also served as a legal extern to the Honorable Timothy Tymkovich during his tenure as Chief Judge of the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. At the Tenth Circuit, Lauren reviewed and edited opinions as well as contributed to published scholarship.

Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • General
  • Government Contracts
  • M&A for Government Contractors
  • Service Contracting

Dynamic Change Continues in Federal Procurement Policy

By Steven Masiello, Gale Monahan, and Sanam Analouei
  • General

Ninth Circuit Upholds Vaccine Mandate, Creating Circuit Split Which Leads to Future Uncertainty of Executive Orders Issued Under the Procurement Act

By Gale Monahan and Meagan R. Fackler
  • General
  • Government Contracts
  • State and Local Government Contracts

Ending Federal DEI: Key Federal Contracting Implications

By Steven Masiello, Phillip Seckman, and Austin Rugh

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Subscribe and stay updated

Receive our latest blog posts by email.

Stay in Touch

Dentons logo

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site